SPN cons vs. SGA cons
Aug. 31st, 2009 12:40 pmYou know, reading the Twitter reports from the latest SPN con I realized one thing - I like the SGA cons and reports better. Why? Because the SGA actors keep their significant others out of the spotlight.
Don't get me wrong here. I'm happy that Jensen is happy with Danneel and that Jared is happy with Genevieve. But I think it would be wiser if they kept their relationships more private. And no, I don't say it out of jealousy or some misguided belief that Jared and Jensen would fall madly in love with each other if it wasn't for their girlfriends. No, I just vividly remember the bruhaha that turned the fandom upside down when Jared and Sandy broke up. It was his fault or her fault or who knows whose fault and it was embarrassing for everybody involved. Talk about overexposure. Compare that to Joe Flanigan's attitude - he tells a funny story or two about his kids and wife, but he keeps them separate from his career. I think that it helps the fans separate the actor from his role and his career from his private life.
So yeah, I think that it would be wiser if Jared and Jensen kept the private part of their lives more private. It would give the crazy fans less fodder and help the actors maintain some privacy.
Don't get me wrong here. I'm happy that Jensen is happy with Danneel and that Jared is happy with Genevieve. But I think it would be wiser if they kept their relationships more private. And no, I don't say it out of jealousy or some misguided belief that Jared and Jensen would fall madly in love with each other if it wasn't for their girlfriends. No, I just vividly remember the bruhaha that turned the fandom upside down when Jared and Sandy broke up. It was his fault or her fault or who knows whose fault and it was embarrassing for everybody involved. Talk about overexposure. Compare that to Joe Flanigan's attitude - he tells a funny story or two about his kids and wife, but he keeps them separate from his career. I think that it helps the fans separate the actor from his role and his career from his private life.
So yeah, I think that it would be wiser if Jared and Jensen kept the private part of their lives more private. It would give the crazy fans less fodder and help the actors maintain some privacy.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-31 11:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-31 11:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-31 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-31 12:22 pm (UTC)Will you be linking the con reports in your LJ or in the comm?
no subject
Date: 2009-08-31 01:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-31 11:51 am (UTC)Of course, the other part of it is that the SPN fandom has absolutely no sense of boundaries and is totally comfortable with the idea of asking deeply intrusive question about the personal lives of actors and then commenting and speculating on it at length.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-31 12:18 pm (UTC)On the other hand, I read the Twitter reports from yesterday's panels and Danneel sat in the audience and according to the tweets, Jensen kept turning to her and addressing her so often, that she was all red-faced.
I don't know, I wasn't there after all, it's all hear-say for me. But if the attention doesn't sit well with them, maybe discretion would be the way to go?
Re: SPN cons vs. SGA cons
Date: 2009-08-31 05:51 pm (UTC)I wouldn't mind a hot gal sitting next to me. ;-) As to why have the girlfriends with them, I can totally understand 'free first class hotel stay' and being able to splurge on the amenities at the convention's (and fans) expense... but being in the same room as fangirls? I think it's something each couple has to discuss/decide on what works for them. Personally, I don't mind either way; I just know I'd want my 'money's worth' of them 'entertaining' me on stage--I don't need to be rude to them either to be 'entertained'--since this is a paid gig for them with a rate *starting* at $50,000 for *each* (Jared and Jensen), often less than a day.
I also say this as a gal that's only been to a few celeb/fan conventions. {g} I usually prefer fan-only conventions for cost reasons, plus, as a slash fan, it often just works out better.
Re: SPN cons vs. SGA cons
Date: 2009-09-01 07:21 am (UTC)Re: SPN cons vs. SGA cons
Date: 2009-09-01 05:02 pm (UTC)Those expensive gifts the guys like giving each other? Pocket change after these conventions, plus, at least under US tax laws, a good accountant could get some income tax discounts on gifts (e.g. 2008 was up to $12,000 could be written off... oh, say like a, what, $$$$ watch to Jensen). While some fans have tried to make Jared look 'dumb' and he often presents an easy-going demeanor, he's a very smart cookie, when he wants to put his mind to it.
On a selfish note, damn, I'd love to make $50,000 in a day! :-D
no subject
Date: 2009-09-01 07:47 am (UTC)But looking at it objectively ie that the girls really are the guys' girlfriends, I find it ... odd that they're there at all. Some of the reasons that I could think of on why they were there:
1. Jensen is so in love with his gf that he needed her there.
2. The J2 fantasies/blind vice have gotten out of proportion that they need to show the fangirls that they're totally straight.
3. The girls wanted to be there - you know, being territorial and hands off our men they're ours sort of stuff.
I can't help but remember what Gwyneth Paltrow once said in an interview. She said that she and her hubby try not to be at each other's events so as not to take the limelight off each other which I think make lots of sense!
no subject
Date: 2009-09-01 08:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-01 08:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-01 08:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-01 11:53 am (UTC)Tom married Jamie kinda young in his career, but so far, he's committed to her and their marriage (7 years?), AFAIK. Not doing conventions and staying out of the media spotlight probably has kept him out of 'hot water', thus, Jamie was not visible... but he supposedly also likes being a 'homebody' and avoids the media in his downtime:
http://www.superheroprofiles.com/smallville-star-tom-welling-and-wife-jamie/
Even before their marriage, since he avoided the media, Jamie also wasn't seen much, outside premiere events. As a tangent, IIRC, Erica Durance's husband, who also helped her career, was in the SDCC audience for the SV panel.
Even though these celebs have attractive spouses or girlfriends and the 'average' fangirl is not 'Hollywood chic', it still doesn't necessarily negate how some fans are 'throwing' themselves at celebs--really, as was the case with Jensen at Asylum, awhile back, with a fangirl actually attempting to jump him. Though, some celebs have slept with fans. Amusingly enough, sometimes bringing along a girlfriend/wife can offer more bodily protection for a guy, against fangirls, than trained guards. {chuckle} In a way, wouldn't surprise me if Jensen dragged Danneel because he needed her support.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-01 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-01 04:37 pm (UTC)Agreed and they love each other, whether 'cleaned up and fancy' or just doing regular stuff like grocery shopping as an average husband and wife.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-02 06:38 pm (UTC)So, honestly, I can not say they flaunted it in any way. And I think they should be allowed to mention them.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-02 07:27 pm (UTC)I wasn't there and whatever floats their boat. I just prefer when it's the actor, not the actor plus one at these things.