"Guilty Pleasures" by Laurell K. Hamilton
Jul. 28th, 2006 08:20 pmI've finished reading the "Guilty Pleasures" book by Laurell K. Hamilton. It's the first book in her Anita Blake series.
What started like an excellent book with a spunky heroine soon turned into something I didn't like much if at all. Yes, the action side of this book would receive straight five stars, but its characters... three stars at the most. And why?
So, lets take a look at Anita Blake. At first, I thought she was being sarcastic in this very funny way. But then, her sarcasm became malice, spitefulness. Every vampire is a bitch in her eyes, even though they didn't do anything wrong. When a vampire murders a human, it's a murder. When she poisoned a vampire she didn't even know just because he was in the company of the one she wanted to kill, it was justified. Such a hypocrisy. She goes to church but doesn't believe in God's help or maybe even his existence - the church is only good to help her fight vampires. But God forbid the vampires build their own church that doesn't worship God either - then they are monsters in her eyes. She is looking down at every supernatural being out there. She is bad-mouthing them, calling them names but she is always ready to press them for informations, to exploit them only to discard them when they are not needed anymore. The supernatural beings are accepted by the society and the law so with her attitude, she is actually a modern racist and it becomes more and more pronounced as the book continues.
Another thing completely is her unwillingness to accept help - she is not self-sufficient, she is simply stupid. Sorry, but when a world-class assassin offers help in the battle against the mighty lord of the vampires she sends him where the sun doesn't shine and hangs up on him. And in the end, she does have to accept this help - only an innocent had to die for her to see it.
And now to the characters: they are simply flat. Anita? Sorry, but that's not a character you could call deep or even likable. All she does is complain and bitch. About everything. Edward? Yeah, Mr. Death... and that's it. No background, not explained or even hinted at from where these two know each other. Ronnie? Was there even a purpose for this one to be there? I didn't feel any connection. Nothing.
The only thing, the only character I truly enjoyed was Phillip. He tried, he really did. He risked everything for Anita and she preached down at him every time she opened her mouth even knowing his background. She never forgot to put him in his place. But he got up every time and tried to do his best.
So, all in all, I liked the action. Very much disliked the characters. And wished this book was about Phillip. Three stars and I'm being generous here.
What started like an excellent book with a spunky heroine soon turned into something I didn't like much if at all. Yes, the action side of this book would receive straight five stars, but its characters... three stars at the most. And why?
So, lets take a look at Anita Blake. At first, I thought she was being sarcastic in this very funny way. But then, her sarcasm became malice, spitefulness. Every vampire is a bitch in her eyes, even though they didn't do anything wrong. When a vampire murders a human, it's a murder. When she poisoned a vampire she didn't even know just because he was in the company of the one she wanted to kill, it was justified. Such a hypocrisy. She goes to church but doesn't believe in God's help or maybe even his existence - the church is only good to help her fight vampires. But God forbid the vampires build their own church that doesn't worship God either - then they are monsters in her eyes. She is looking down at every supernatural being out there. She is bad-mouthing them, calling them names but she is always ready to press them for informations, to exploit them only to discard them when they are not needed anymore. The supernatural beings are accepted by the society and the law so with her attitude, she is actually a modern racist and it becomes more and more pronounced as the book continues.
Another thing completely is her unwillingness to accept help - she is not self-sufficient, she is simply stupid. Sorry, but when a world-class assassin offers help in the battle against the mighty lord of the vampires she sends him where the sun doesn't shine and hangs up on him. And in the end, she does have to accept this help - only an innocent had to die for her to see it.
And now to the characters: they are simply flat. Anita? Sorry, but that's not a character you could call deep or even likable. All she does is complain and bitch. About everything. Edward? Yeah, Mr. Death... and that's it. No background, not explained or even hinted at from where these two know each other. Ronnie? Was there even a purpose for this one to be there? I didn't feel any connection. Nothing.
The only thing, the only character I truly enjoyed was Phillip. He tried, he really did. He risked everything for Anita and she preached down at him every time she opened her mouth even knowing his background. She never forgot to put him in his place. But he got up every time and tried to do his best.
So, all in all, I liked the action. Very much disliked the characters. And wished this book was about Phillip. Three stars and I'm being generous here.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 07:01 pm (UTC)I liked one character, and one character only, and once he was dead... I was done. There just wasn't enough there to keep me reading.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 07:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 07:40 pm (UTC)Anita learns. She starts trying to save vampires under the influence of the big bad evil vampires. It'd been so long since I'd read the first book that I forgot she originally saw things in black and white, before her worldview became shades of gray.
Edward gets more story in "Obsidian Butterfly." (But I hated that one.) Ronnie never gets better. I hope she gets her throat torn out at some point.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 08:36 pm (UTC)I read the first Harry Dresden book a while back. He didn't grab me. I have books 2-4, but I don't have any desire to read them at the moment.
Ever try Rachel Caine's Warden series? Or Charlaine Harris' Sookie Stackhouse books? They're better.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 09:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-29 12:14 am (UTC)Oh, well, there's Rachel's partner Jenks. He's male, but he's a pixy and therefore small. I love him. Muchly. *makes up words*
no subject
Date: 2006-07-31 12:24 pm (UTC)for vampire books i recommend
Elizabeth Kostova's the Historian and
Roderick Anscombe's Secret history of Laszlo, Count Dracula.
they're both very good intelligent books with proper characters and great action.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 07:22 pm (UTC)And I love books about werewolves - any tips there? ;)