katikat: (A_TomBeck)
[personal profile] katikat
M:I1 definitely didn't age well. I mean, I know that it's been 21 years, still... it felt too... dated? Like the old Bond movies, a bit too ridiculous and not gritty enough to be suspenseful. I don't know if that was the goal, the evoke the atmosphere of the TV series, but that's how it felt. And Tom Cruise was so young there!

M:I2 was, IMO, much better, thanks to John Woo and Hans Zimmer and Tom Cruise taking his stunt work even farther. I'm not saying that it's the best movie in the series - I think that that honor belongs to M:I4 - but it has definitely the best cinematography. John Woo is brilliant in that way. The slo-mo, the doves in the fire... the visuals were simply breathtaking. And Tom Cruise has never been prettier *happy sigh*

Date: 2017-08-06 09:43 am (UTC)
nomango: (Default)
From: [personal profile] nomango
Even when MI:1 came out, I remember it looking dated even then. So yeah, I think they were trying to evoke nostalgia for the old series - and then badguy-ed the original hero character, taking away any goodwill those old fans might have had! :) I remember the uproar that caused.

And the flamenco dancing in MI:2 - that was lovely. Where they were staring at each other and everything is slomo and striking colours. I loved his chemistry with Thandie too.


katikat: (Default)
don't be dull, be fannish

October 2017

1234 567
89 1011121314

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 22nd, 2017 02:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios