Is it good or is it bad? *scratches head*
Aug. 7th, 2009 08:57 amFrom Joseph Mallozzi's blog:
I can't believe that I sank to the point where I visited his blog again - but I need news, some news about the movie. Yes, my love for SGA is still going strong!
And Chuck: Chuck won't return until March 2010 *pouts* On the other hand:
Hm - we have to wait seven more months for new episodes, but we might get more than 13? Is it good or is it bad news? *cocks head*
Jenn writes: “So, Joe, uhm…is there any word about the SGA movie? Any word at all? Are you still optimistic that it’s going to happen?”
Answer: As I’ve said all along, I’m going to assume we are making a movie until somebody actually tells me we aren’t. And that hasn’t happened yet. Also, if the plan was never to make a movie, Paul and I wouldn’t have been hired to write and produce it. If at some point they’d decided not to do it, you’d think they would have said “Hey, stop writing that script!” rather than paying us for something they had no intention of using.
I can't believe that I sank to the point where I visited his blog again - but I need news, some news about the movie. Yes, my love for SGA is still going strong!
And Chuck: Chuck won't return until March 2010 *pouts* On the other hand:
But there was a glimmer of hope. In a larger conversation about the relative successes and failures of shows like The Listener, The Philanthropist and Merlin this summer, Bromstad discussed the possibility of extending Chuck's episode order to help launch a more high-profile summer 2010 slate.
Hm - we have to wait seven more months for new episodes, but we might get more than 13? Is it good or is it bad news? *cocks head*