Date: 2010-03-20 12:52 pm (UTC)
I absolutely agree with you and Peter - if you break the law and get caught, you need to be punished for that. That's what law is for after all. And I agree that the writers didn't think this through, not really. They obviously don't want to touch on that subject - and no wonder, there's no way to fluff that up.

In The Portrait, Peter told the woman that Neal was a criminal, that he escaped because of a girl etc. and there really was no reason to go into such detail. You see in that scene how that startled Neal, he just froze. I mean, obviously, it was there to show the growing trust between Peter and Neal, because Peter dialed it down pretty quickly after that.

But remember in Book of Hours, how angry Peter got when Ruiz refused to cooperate with them because of Neal? Peter was basically having the same misgivings, but it angered him when someone else used them against Neal. Again, it might have been there to basically kick Peter in the shin and tell him "See? That's exactly what you're doing!"

Basically, a nice development when you watch it in one row, when you see how Peter slowly learns not have a knee-jerk reaction to everything. Which lead to Home Invasion and their shouting match about Alex, a huge step back. But when Peter calmed down, he just knew that Neal did not do it.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

katikat: (Default)
don't be dull, be fannish

March 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
171819202122 23
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 31st, 2025 12:40 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios