ext_29937 ([identity profile] nereem.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] katikat 2008-02-24 10:39 am (UTC)

I know- he was a beanpole! ^_^

I know your opinion on John- (I kinda liked/like John) but I'm not aghast to read stories where he may have abused them, I like to see each and everyones take on it. I think to some degree what he did over the boys was something that should have been avoided- Dean's lack of self worth didn't come merely from his own thinking, it was played out (intentially or not) by the fact he had to be the sole protector of his brother, constantly. I don't think John didn't love his boys- he wasn't very fleshed out as a characther either, so we only got snippets of it and what we saw was harsh, solidering, who wanted to do the good and got distracted by self catering hate on revenge. I think where John was sometimes mean or cruel, Sam is like that, from his father. Sam definietly has a cruel side (as does Dean) and what I love more about the characters ARE their flaws. I dont think they dont have them or try and defend when they do something that's hurtful to each other- because it's what people do. Brothers especially ;)

Sam was stepping up with support when Henricksen said that. Be it if John was a good father or not- no one gets to talk about their daddy but them ;P Its like, Dean can mouth off about John and Sam can, but I guess they would't take it if someone (especially Henrickson) would throw a comment like that to them.


Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting